Current wording:

The world “Resolve” means to perform the act, as an Admin, of enacting or failing a Proposal, a Call for Judgment or a Declaration of Victory. The world “Resolution” means the act of doing so.

Judgement/Judgment is localized spelling thing, they are both correct, like flavour/flavor.

Although the final sentence is redundant.

[Kevan] Oh, right. Well, it doesn‘t hurt either.

Well, CallForJudgment is an anon account that used to be used for anonymous CFJs; and CallForJudgement is me. (I was forced to change the name by proposal, though, because people thought it was confusing.)

It’s already implied by the rules.

[Qwazukee] Is it? The rules define Resolution as “enacting or failing a proposal/CfJ/DoV”, so currently if we say “a Player can resolve a Shipwreck Event by rolling DICE10” it means “a Player can enact or fail a proposal/CfJ/DoV somehow connected to a Shipwreck Event by rolling DICE10”.

We should maybe just avoid using the word “resolve”, though, if the only reason Keba is making this change is because he accidentally used the word “resolve” in a proposal. We aren’t making the same exceptions for “Vote” or “Enact”.

I don’t really understand this enough to not trust the elders

I’m with 90000, I trust those who have played this far longer than I.

Um, 90000 has been playing much longer than myself, and Kyre joined within about a month of me. Just for the record.

Ok Kevan, but I don’t think there is any confusion when this rule is used in the normal English context. Either way, the last sentence is definitely unnecessary like you said.

as a harmless patch to the “Resolved” definition that I wrote in the first place.

[Qwazukee] The sense of the Glossary is that the eliminate the normal English meaning of those words. The “normal English meaning” cannot be an argument for anything then anymore.

“A keyword defined by a rule supersedes the normal English usage of the word. A keyword defined in this glossary supersedes that defined by a rule.”

The Glossary is only there to supplement, it doesn’t remove the normal English meaning when the Glossary definition doesn’t apply.

[Qwazukee] Right, and therefore I try to change the Glossary, so it doesn‘t apply for “resolving a trade”.