I’m not sure how it’s anonymous if we can all see the edit history of the wiki page, but it sounds fun!

It’s a Virtual Action, so adding a Rumor is done by privately messaging the Concierge. The edit history for Rumors will all be from Kevan, which makes it anonymous as to who authored each Rumor.

Oh, okay! Thank you for explaining that :)

An interesting rules point: this says “on behalf of the Agent” which implies it’s the Agent that did the change. That means that the fact that the Agent performed it is gamestate, and (per “Representations of the Gamestate”) is tracked in the wiki history – which implies that Kevan needs to state who created the Rumour when updating the wiki page.

(Hopefully Kevan’s using a method of tracking for virtual actions that change secret information that is also capable of tracking history. If not, he would have to put the history onto the Gamestate Modifications page, making the secret actions public.)

If you object to this proposal for the reason of tracking virtual actions by the Agent who performed them, then you should object to the entirety of this dynasty from the beginning, as it was built entirely on Agents performing virtual actions.

The history is tracked in the same place as the gamestate it modifies. That can work for virtual actions that update secretly tracked variables, but I suspect it doesn’t work for virtual actions that update publicly tracked variables.