Timed out. Passes 5-0—Clucky
Adminned at 26 May 2021 22:47:02 UTC
If “Collector’s Dozen” enacted, replace “(randomly picking one tied for the most if their is a tie)” in the Round Summary with:-
(breaking ties by highest Assets - a Broker’s Assets being the total of their Cash and the Prices in their Collection - and if still tied, at random)
Kudos is a relatively low number and may well end up tied. We’re measuring another stat, so could use that one first.
I thought about doing this in my initial proposal. Held off because the thought was that if you don’t spend your money to help you win that is your fault. But I really have no strong preferences either way.
If players don’t spend all of their money and yet still get to the victory tiebreaker, how much they didn’t have to spend seems worth recognising.
I think plugging “how good were you at gaining other resources?” tiebreakers in is always fine for finding out who the game thinks the best player was, before we give up and toss a “we literally cannot tell who played better here” coin.
BlogNomic is an online Nomic: a self-modifying game where changing the rules is part of the game. Players make blog posts proposing additions or alterations to the ruleset, discussing and casting votes in the comments: if enough vote in favour, the rules are changed and play continues.
The game has been running since 2003 and resets every month or so. Have a look around the wiki for more information and history. New players are always welcome and can join in the game at any time.
BlogNomic is powered by pMachine ExpressionEngine.
Trapdoorspyder: he/him