Monday, May 24, 2021

Proposal: Saatchiarchy

Timed out. Passes 5-0—Clucky

Adminned at 26 May 2021 22:47:02 UTC

If “Collector’s Dozen” enacted, replace “(randomly picking one tied for the most if their is a tie)” in the Round Summary with:-

(breaking ties by highest Assets - a Broker’s Assets being the total of their Cash and the Prices in their Collection - and if still tied, at random)

Kudos is a relatively low number and may well end up tied. We’re measuring another stat, so could use that one first.



24-05-2021 15:20:41 UTC


Clucky: he/him

24-05-2021 16:28:57 UTC


I thought about doing this in my initial proposal. Held off because the thought was that if you don’t spend your money to help you win that is your fault. But I really have no strong preferences either way.

Kevan: Oracle he/him

24-05-2021 17:14:24 UTC

If players don’t spend all of their money and yet still get to the victory tiebreaker, how much they didn’t have to spend seems worth recognising.

I think plugging “how good were you at gaining other resources?” tiebreakers in is always fine for finding out who the game thinks the best player was, before we give up and toss a “we literally cannot tell who played better here” coin.

Raven1207: he/him

24-05-2021 19:01:02 UTC


Jason: he/him

25-05-2021 00:16:49 UTC


Josh: he/him

26-05-2021 08:43:51 UTC



26-05-2021 10:49:38 UTC