Sunday, January 31, 2010

Proposal: Safety in Numbers

Timed out 19 votes to 0. Enacted by Kevan.

Adminned at 03 Feb 2010 08:44:06 UTC

In the rule “The Safe”, if it exists, replace “The Safe has a Combination lock with 3 numbers between 1 and 1000 known only to the Executor.” with:-

The Safe has a nine-digit Combination lock determined by the Executor.

...and remove “in the right order”.

In the rule “Combination Lock”, if it exists, replace “either a hint for any of the numbers in the Combination or a hint for the order of the Combination.” with:-

of either a chain of three consecutive numbers from the Combination, or a single number of the Combination and its position. (This is determined at random.)

Upon enactment of this proposal, the Combination shall change to a nine-digit number previously determined by the Executor.

Proposing a fixed clue mechanism for the combination, rather than me giving vague “hints”.

Comments

Klisz:

31-01-2010 23:37:15 UTC

for

Ornithopter:

31-01-2010 23:55:55 UTC

for

redtara: they/them

01-02-2010 02:40:14 UTC

for

alethiophile:

01-02-2010 02:53:46 UTC

for

Rodlen:

01-02-2010 03:12:03 UTC

for

Darknight: he/him

01-02-2010 03:19:03 UTC

for

Thrawn:

01-02-2010 04:34:04 UTC

for

TrumanCapote:

01-02-2010 05:04:08 UTC

for

tecslicer:

01-02-2010 05:33:59 UTC

for

NonnoNaz:

01-02-2010 07:20:09 UTC

I continue to think that the Safe is an advantage to 4 people only, in this moment.
These are the only ones with the power to prevent someone to become the Heir.
We normal people have only the power of denounce.
For now,  imperial

digibomber:

01-02-2010 07:38:11 UTC

for

Put:

01-02-2010 13:36:15 UTC

“...and remove “in the right order”.”

Won’t that make it much easier to crack?

Kevan: he/him

01-02-2010 13:49:02 UTC

Oh, that was just cleaning up a redundancy from the previous version where the Combination was three numbers. The Combination is now just the Combination. Either you’ve provided it or you haven’t.

Put:

01-02-2010 14:13:53 UTC

Ah, well in that case, for

spikebrennan:

01-02-2010 15:37:04 UTC

for

Nausved:

01-02-2010 17:33:33 UTC

for

Anonyman:

02-02-2010 00:53:12 UTC

for

Oze:

02-02-2010 16:24:28 UTC

for

Uvthenfuv:

02-02-2010 18:24:38 UTC

for

Dustin:

02-02-2010 19:11:00 UTC

for