Saturday, July 31, 2010

Proposal: Sectional Forms

Times out 9-0 with 3 Arrows. Enacted with no PP gained. - lilomar

Adminned at 01 Aug 2010 21:23:44 UTC

Create a new form, entitled 53C70R.

Its description is:

This form has the effect of changing the home-sectors of its primary signatory and all signatories of the same group as the primary one to another sector, as specified in the form.

Its text is:

What is your name? ________
What is your quest? ________
What is your favorite color? ________

For what reason should The Computer process your request? ________
Is this form treasonous because it indicates dissatisfaction with your current sector? ________
Will you therefore allow other signatories of this form to come with you? ________

Do you hereby acknowledge that the Computer is superior to you, and as a result give all authorized agents of the computer permission to shave your head, create a wig from your hair, and force you or anyone else to wear that wig? ________

Your cooperation is hereby appreciated.

ADDENDUM: To what sector do you not wish to be transferred? ________

Its required list of signatories is:

Four Citizens must sign this form, at least two (including the primary signatory) of them being of the same group.

Its additional requirements are:

The first field shall specify the name of the primary signatory.
The second field shall specify “To be transferred to sector X.”, where X is a sector
The third field shall specify a color, or “I, no, J!” where I and J are each colors, and are not identical
The fourth field shall specify a valid reason to be transferred. The High-Programmer may deem the reason inappropriate, and accordingly fail the Form immediately, but only if the reason is actually inappropriate.
The fifth field shall specify “Yes”. It is treasonous for this field to specify “Yes”.
The seventh field shall specify “Yes”.
The eighth field shall specify a sector other than the primary signatory’s current sector and other than the sector provided in the second field.

Only the High-Programmer may pass this form (since only he knows if the requirements have been met).

I think this is right but I’m leaving; I’ll find out in the morning

Comments

Keba:

31-07-2010 11:04:58 UTC

for

lilomar:

31-07-2010 15:49:43 UTC

arrow  for

Darknight: he/him

31-07-2010 20:32:09 UTC

imperial

Qwazukee:

01-08-2010 00:11:45 UTC

imperial  arrow

lilomar:

01-08-2010 01:17:24 UTC

Citizen Qwazukee-R-DDA-1, consider this an official reprimand which will become a Treason point if you do not change your comment to reflect the correct order of Icons.

Official Mandate number 2.1.4.1 clearly states that ARROWS must go BEFORE your Vote in order to count. In addition, it makes it difficult for the Kind workers of CPU to process a proposal, as the alethiobot becomes confused if you have a non-voting icon as the last icon in your comment.

Thank you and have a happy daycycle.

Galdyn:

01-08-2010 02:40:08 UTC

for

spikebrennan:

01-08-2010 03:46:00 UTC

arrow  for

scshunt:

01-08-2010 06:27:20 UTC

Hmm… this may be a bug:
arrow  for

Wakukee:

01-08-2010 08:07:06 UTC

imperial

Qwazukee:

01-08-2010 09:10:32 UTC

Hmm, there appears to be a glitch in the High-Programmer, as imperial  arrow is certainly the right order.

Purplebeard:

01-08-2010 09:37:34 UTC

for

lilomar:

01-08-2010 14:43:32 UTC

When voting on a Proposal, a Citizen may include the ARROW (arrow.gif) icon in their EVC and before their Vote

Qwazukee:

01-08-2010 17:42:51 UTC

Yes, but I am nowhere forbidden from including an ARROW wherever I like.

lilomar:

01-08-2010 18:17:52 UTC

Qwaz: this is true, but if you want it to count, it must be before, and I am soon going to start handing out treason points for improper ordering of icons, due to confusing the alethiobot.