Proposal: Seems Kinda Sus
Times out unpopular 2-2. -Bucky
Adminned at 09 Oct 2023 03:18:23 UTC
Add a subrule to “Meddling” called “Heat”
Each Punter has a non-negative integer amount of Heat, which is privately tracked by the Bookie and is by default 0.
Whenever a Punter plans a Sport’s Meddling, their heat is increased by 1.
When the Bookie Scopes a Punter, they roll a DICE10. If the result is greater than or equal to the Punter’s current Heat the Punter passes. Otherwise, the Punter is fined 20 Readies and their Heat is reduced by 2 (to a minimum of 0),
In “Sports Resolution” replace
the Bookie applies all Meddlings that were planned against Participants in that Event. (If the same Meddling would be applied multiple times to the same Participant in an Event, it is instead only applied once.)
with
the Bookie takes all Meddlings that were planned against Participants in that Event and puts them a random order. For each such Meddling (in the new order) the Bookie Scopes the Punter who initiated the Meddling. If the Punter passes the Scope, the Meddling is applied (unless the same Meddling has already been applied to the same Participant in the same Event, or the same Symmetric Meddling has already been applied to the same Event). Otherwise it is not applied.
Replace the sub-rule “Accusations” in “Meddling” with
The bookie should, at their earliest convivence, remove all Meddling’s that were created before the proposal “Seems Kinda Sus” passed, unless the Punter who planned that meddling clearly communicated with the bookie that they wanted the meddling to persist upon “Seems Kinda Sus” being enacted in which case that Meddling in question remains and the Punter who planned it gains 1 heat. The Bookie should then delete the subrule “Accusations.
The bookie may not generate any resolutions.
JonathanDark: he/him
Hopefully “convivence” can just be treated as a spelling mistake.