will be voting against once this gets out of the edit window because Bucky’s choice to lock my proposal from editing rather than giving me space to reword it makes it pretty likely he has some sort of scam cooked up with his wording

If “Walking the Walk” passes, this will essentially place the same item onto the Mandate List twice.

Is that a problem?

A problem, no. But it kinda defeats the point of adding new requirements if you just copy other ones and reword them

If Walking the Walk also enacts, this new restriction is stricter in that it judges not just the branch of the proposal that would be taken if it were immediately enacted, but also any restrictions it might conditionally add to the list.

Unless, with the broader interpretation of Walking the Walk, it’s less strict in that it doesn’t require compliance with all entries that might hypothetically be added under any circumstances.

that is a good point. I feel like someone could probably write a proposal phrased in a way such that “could possibly add to the Mandate List” could probably create a paradox where it is impossible to determine if it is a misfit or not

“If this proposal is Misfit, add the following entry to the Mandate List…”

version 1.1 now explicitly calls out impossible conditions, the proposal must comply even with an effect it conditionally adds but with a literally impossible condition.

I unidle

per Walking the Walk

Whoops

Explicit Author

as Walking the Walk failed