Friday, February 08, 2013

Proposal: Serious Agendas

Timed out and failed, 4-4. Josh

Adminned at 10 Feb 2013 10:45:55 UTC

Append to the Rule “Agendas”:

If an Activity is not adequately relevant to its corresponding Item, Honourable Members can and should indicate this by including with their vote the phrase “Insufficient Contribution”. If a Quorum of the votes on the Activity include the phrase “Insufficient Contribution”, then the Activity cannot resolve its corresponding Item, and the Activity’s author looses 1 Credibility instead of any Credibility possibly gained from the Proposal being resolved. The Subject of a subsequent Proposal that seeks to resolve the Item should start with “RETRY:”.

[http://blognomic.com/archive/developing_party_internal_practices/] is a throwaway Proposal, but it’ll still resolve its corresponding Item.

Comments

RaichuKFM: she/her

08-02-2013 03:24:40 UTC

for  arrow

Larrytheturtle:

08-02-2013 03:26:28 UTC

for  arrow

Spitemaster:

08-02-2013 04:24:11 UTC

for  arrow

Purplebeard:

08-02-2013 08:01:54 UTC

against Apart from this being another transparent attempt at ex post facto legislation against my person by the Greens, I’d prefer that we only award the bonus for enacted Activities.

Also, “loses.”

Josh: Observer he/they

08-02-2013 08:04:19 UTC

against Per Redbeard

Skju:

08-02-2013 12:51:26 UTC

for  arrow
Purplebeard, this Proposal has nothing to do with the Credibility gain of a passed Activity, but I do agree with you.

And did you really think that your cheeky attempt to wave aside our important work would go unmarked?

Klisz:

08-02-2013 15:43:37 UTC

against

Henri:

10-02-2013 18:43:47 UTC

against