Note: Can you more clearly define diagonal movement?

Feels unclear and scamabble, 2 diagonal moves are equal to 3 regular, but what about one? Or four?

Note: in regards to the above, consider the Cardinal directions when clarifying. Might help. It might be nice to have a sort of compass. In fact I might propose just that some time soon, once I get around to examining the rules more carefully.

Try to remember to keep Notes: as, well, Notes:.

There’s little point in not making a comment a Note:, if there are no votes yet, if you’re not voting in it.

Will need some fixes as stated above but that can be done later as this doesn’t immediately hurt anything. I also think we need to get out of the habit of waiting so long to vote in case of a note.

Hmm. Could we possibly just remove the Note:s and just flat out say you can edit it as long as there are no votes?

Hoping to see a nerf on the bigger ships.

Why nerf? It costs more pieces.

I’m with Larry, really.

So as to prevent one dominating class. For example, all-powerful juggernauts (non-existent in this dynasty) were slower than smaller ships.

Note: in the future please write proposals that don’t assume a previously pending proposal passes. This is why you’ll see proposals that say “If the proposal (link) fails, this proposal does nothing” that way we aren’t stuck trying to edit a ships rule that doesn’t exist when admining a proposal.

Still, the tally HAS reached more than quorum. I would take a epic changing of votes for it to fail.

Actually it would just take me changing my vote or a raichu veto. Likely not gonna happen, but it’s always better safe than sorry

I stand corrected.

whoops, you’re right, i’ll make sure to remember that next time