Idling myself due to unconsciousness. Player count is 7, quorum is 4.

It’s pretty strange to me that this isn’t Roughhousing by virtue of “distance” even though it requires both villagers to be in the same location, while Roughhousing can target players across 32-hour routes. Will be voting against, I think.

It’s more that it ignores the Cudgel vs no Cudgel issue, and “distance” is the thematic reason, if not the mechanical one. Otherwise, trying to stuff it into Roughhousing while still trying to ignore the Cudgel rules becomes overly complicated.

That said, if your only objection really is that it’s not in Roughhousing, I still have time to amend the Proposal so that it is there. I would still be inclined to add in an “ignore Cudgel” clause, because we already have Douse, and the whole point here is to have a weapon that us non-Cudgel folks can use to effect.

If your issue is with giving non-Cudgel folks parity, that’s fine, just say so, and I’ll stop trying to do that.

At the rate you’re searching, I’d be pretty surprised if you remain sans cudgel for long. Also, I have nails and electric gloves, so I’m not blind to the fact that this could help me—unless, of course, two players with Thick Jackets were to both assemble slingshots and team up on the sole occupant of the Village Square.

All that said, my primary issue really is ludonarrative dissonance, and any scams that I’m not seeing that fall under the umbrella of “it’s not roughhousing so…”

Ok, it’s now under Roughhousing. Got the edit in with a few minutes to spare before the 4-hour edit window

It’s probably moot, but we’ll see how the CfJ shakes out

  withdrawn due to DoV