on several counts - for example, I might not be reliably available to make the required posts - but I think you should repropose this in smaller pieces.

Monday, “Proposal” classes. All Proposals made during this class that have a “For” vote from the Professor needs Quorum minus one vote to pass. Analogously, all Proposals made during this class that have an “Against” vote from the Professor needs Quorum minus one vote to fail. All students can have up to 3 pending Proposals, if at least two of them were made during this class.The Professor shall take a break from his own Proposals to evaluate the Students work, and won’t be making any Proposals this day.

First off, it just needs “Quorum minus one votes” of any kind to pass. Even if written as “Quorum minus one FOR votes” something with 7 FOR votes and 8 AGAINST could still be both failed and passed.

—-

Tuesday, “Weighting” classes. All Students shall take a time to analyze the Pending Votable Matters (PVM), which means they must have an EVC on every PVM that have been pending for at least an hour before making other actions, which includes making a new PVM.

If its (that have been pending for at least an hour) before making other actions this isn’t terrible but still annoying and might cause a ton of DEF votes. But it could also be read as (that have been pending) (for at least an hour before making other actions) which is clearly no good

—-

Wednesday, “The Ruleset” classes. The professor shall make a posts to discuss the current Ruleset. He and the students should compare it to other Dynasties Rulesets. This is an optional class, which means a Student can’t be said to have missed it.

enough alone to make me case a DEF vote even if I liked the rest, because we shouldn’t force Bucky to have to do anything

Everything else gets one of those three comments. So

Thanks for the criticism, I actually rushed this a little since I had to do other stuff. It was more of a way for me to evaluate if there was an interest in this kind of proposals and how good (or bad) my ‘writting rules’ skill is.
I’ll kill this and redesign it when I have an open slot.

(also, please keep posting criticism, if there is anything someone else wants to add)

We’ve spend several days arguing about the definition of achievements and it’s super boring. I’d really like a mechanic that introduces some actual game. I’d be happy to pass this and work on fixing it at this stage.

This proposal was being written for 1.5 hours :) I was quite surprised when discovered that something new appeared between Murphy’s proposals.

per Clucky

@quirck: Yeah, I didn’t know that would happen. At first I thought he made his post sticky for some reason. I’ll fix my posts’ time from now on…

@Josh: I agree with the first part, but not even I want it to pass while I don’t fix the points Clucky made. I’ll kill this as soon as an admin fails the “team work” and “sense of organization”, giving me an open slot for a new proposal.

Time to work on it.