I have a concern: I think this makes Reviews much harder to write, because you would have to calculate the new Rating afterwards.

It might make more sense to do a one-off calculation in a blog post instead?

Hard to know how to vote on this, as my order of preference is repeal > as is > oublic tracking.

repeal

@Josh: I think you could vote either def or against and then add the repeal text to your vote.

That way, it will repeal if it’s a quorum, you add your vote to keep it the status quo, and if a majority overrule you and vote for without repeal, only then is it public tracking.

@ais: we could do a one-off on in a blog post, but the question is: when does that trigger? If we wait too long, it becomes pointless if, for example, there’s already a quorum or near a quorum of Ballots filled out.

repeal

Just to get my EVC on this:

repeal

@JonathanDark: You can just do it in an unofficial blog post, whenever you want to. It doesn’t need a rule backing it.

, with no strong need to remove it from the ruleset.

[ais523] Posting updates doesn’t need a rule, but having one would (depending on the wording) mean that deliberately posting false values would be cheating at the game, rather than mere conversational misrepresentation.

repeal, I guess

Repeal. I am for the values being public, but also would prefer to repeal “Rating” as currently the value of the rule “Rating” is without contribution to the current gamestate.

Technically, Verba’s vote doesn’t count as they were not unidled yet when it was made (at least I don’t think so).

Verba, if you wish for your vote to count, please make the same comment again.

Repeal. I am for the values being public, but also would prefer to repeal “Rating” as currently the value of the rule “Rating” is without contribution to the current gamestate.

[Jonathan] It counts; retroactivity is hopefully the most common sense approach and is covered as a recurring question in the FAQ.

I stand corrected, thanks!

repeal

CoV to make this Proposal reach quorum: repeal