Proposal: Slightly fixed
5-2. Timed out, enacted by Excalabur. 3 votes contained “Why?”.
Adminned at 13 May 2006 15:35:28 UTC
Add a new Guest profile to the list in Rule 2.7:
Devil’s Advocate: While a Monk is accompanying a Devil’s Advocate, e should vote AGAINST all pending proposals. Also, whenever e votes AGAINST a proposal, e must also make a comment that points out a flaw or otherwise discourages others from voting for that proposal. A Devil’s Advocate does not expire normally. Instead, at least 48 hours after the creation of a Devil’s Advocate, anyone may roll DICE(Proposals adminned while Advocate existed). If the result is less or equal to than the number of failed or vetoed proposals, the Advocate acheives its goal and the Player accompanying it receives 4 Integrity times the DICE roll. Otherwise, it ceases to exist without acheiving its goal with the normal loss of Integrity.
And now for the random thing of the day:
Unless at least three comments containing counted votes also contain the text “Why?”, rules 2.10 and 2.13 swap contents and titles.
We’ve been over this before, but: random and useless add-ons to a Proposal can only convince me to vote against it.
Why?
Elias IX: Idle
Haha… Why? You’re an admin too, so you should be knowledgable of the pain this causes.