Friday, January 31, 2025

Proposal: Slipping out the Back

Reaches quorum 5-0 with 1 DEF and is enacted -SingularByte

Adminned at 02 Feb 2025 17:20:20 UTC

Create a subrule of Teams and Targets called Rogues {I}:

Each non-Mastermind may have a Characteristic of Rogue. Participants who have the Rogue Characteristic are known as Rogue Participants. Non-Mastermind Participants can freely add or remove their own Rogue characteristic as they wish, with the exception that if they have a Triumphs of 0, they automatically lose it and cannot gain Rogue for as long as they still have a Triumphs value of 0.

Rogue Participants’ Targets are considered to be legal values for that Participant so long as they were obtained legally, even when a Mastermind ceases to have that Target.

When a Participant ceases to be Rogue, if they have a Target not shared with any Mastermind, they lose their Target. If they lose their Target in this way and have a focus of *, their Focus becomes 0.

As a Daily Communal Action, any Participant may Roll Call: For each Rogue who has a target, if that target is not shared by a Mastermind, reduce that Rogue’s triumphs by 1.


Replace the bullet points in Teams and Targets and their introductory sentence with:

Any non-Rogue Participant with a Target that is present as a word in the ruletext may perform the following actions simultaneously:
* Remove all Targets from all non-Rogue Participants;
* Increase by 1 the Triumphs count of each non-Rogue Participant whose Target appeared as a word in the ruletext immediately before this set of simultaneous actions was performed.
* For each non-Rogue Participant with a focus of *, set their focus to 0.

This is based on ais’ and Habanero’s suggestions. Thanks both.

Comments

ais523:

31-01-2025 23:39:24 UTC

This should probably do something to Rogues who run out of Triumphs (presumably losing their targets)? Apart from that, this looks good.

JonathanDark: he/him

31-01-2025 23:41:12 UTC

This could also be a Characteristic (if we are serious about reducing rule text where we can)

SingularByte: he/him

31-01-2025 23:48:50 UTC

Both fixed.

ais523:

01-02-2025 00:14:13 UTC

I’m not sure you explicitly need to say that Rogue can be a Characteristic – the Reputation rule allows any Characteristic as it is, and it’s weird to define it twice.

Josh: he/they

01-02-2025 09:24:20 UTC

imperial

Habanero:

01-02-2025 17:25:55 UTC

for Seems better to me

Raven1207: Monarchple he/they

02-02-2025 00:53:42 UTC

for

ais523:

02-02-2025 04:19:09 UTC

for

JonathanDark: he/him

02-02-2025 14:17:49 UTC

for