Tuesday, April 12, 2011

Proposal: Slumsheep Millionaire

Fails at 5-12. -Purplebeard

Adminned at 13 Apr 2011 00:12:03 UTC

Add a new rule to the ruleset, entitled National Lottewery:

Each Sheep has a collection of Lottewe numbers, which are tracked in the GNDT. As a daily action, provided that they possess at least 1 Baabuck, a Sheep may pay 1 Baabuck to add a number, either at random or of their choice, between 1 and 49 to their Lottewe numbers.

Add a new subrule to the rule called Officials, entitled Voice of the Baaalls:

Duties: To oversee the Lottewe drawing and disperse prizes.
Powers: As a weekly action, but no less frequently than once every 10 days, the Voice of the Baaalls may select three separate numbers between 1 and 49 by their own means. They must then publish those numbers as a Story Post. Once the numbers have been posted, the Voice of the Baaalls must allocate prizes. Every Sheep whose Lottewe column contains exactly one of the winning numbers gains 3 Baabucks. Every Sheep whose Lottewe column contains exactly two of the winning numbers gains 10 Baabucks. Every Sheep whose Lottewe column contains all three of the winning numbers gains 30 Baabucks.

Once these awards have been made, the Voice of the Baaalls must revert the Lottewe column of all Sheep to -.

Comments

William:

12-04-2011 10:34:59 UTC

for

Roujo: he/him

12-04-2011 15:36:50 UTC

for

Klisz:

12-04-2011 16:21:13 UTC

for

Bucky:

12-04-2011 16:23:20 UTC

against .  Is there any reason for the Voice to not select eir own numbers?

Josh: Observer he/they

12-04-2011 16:25:47 UTC

Ah, quite right, forgot to put in that the Voice can’t play. Will propose a fix and prevent anyone from taking the role in the meantime, if this passes.

lilomar:

12-04-2011 17:12:55 UTC

against why not use GNDT for selection? more transparent, and I don’t see any benefit for allowing the Voice to simply choose who will win.

Josh: Observer he/they

12-04-2011 17:31:28 UTC

Less transparency = more fun.

Subrincinator:

12-04-2011 19:19:49 UTC

imperial

ais523:

12-04-2011 19:30:22 UTC

against I’m a little concerned about the Voice just handing off 30 Baabucks to a coconspirator; any possible penalties for doing that would be minor in comparison, with the current ruleset.

I like the idea, though, and I’d give you a procedural veto to be able to go fix it, if that existed any more.

Darknight: he/him

12-04-2011 20:26:54 UTC

for

Roujo: he/him

12-04-2011 21:02:32 UTC

CoV against Per ais523

Winner:

12-04-2011 21:04:12 UTC

against

Saakara:

12-04-2011 22:47:42 UTC

for

udqbpn:

12-04-2011 22:51:40 UTC

imperial

Chivalrybean:

13-04-2011 01:48:28 UTC

for

scshunt:

13-04-2011 02:20:58 UTC

against

Travis:

13-04-2011 02:41:56 UTC

30 Baabucks is quite a lot to be handed out by one Sheep to another. If a weekly wage is a single Baabuck, I’m getting the impression that a Baabuck is a substantial amount of currency. against

William:

13-04-2011 03:17:25 UTC

against

William:

13-04-2011 03:17:46 UTC

(CoV per ais)

Kevan: he/him

13-04-2011 07:06:37 UTC

imperial

Purplebeard:

13-04-2011 07:10:55 UTC

against