You spelled “Matterium” as “Materium” with one “t” the first time. It can probably be chalked up to a spelling mistake, but if you have time to edit, might as well fix it.

Bucky, did you see & understand the trigger that i set?

See? Yes. Understand? Maybe, but it looks illegal.

check again; i’m trying to communicate something to you.

anyway, i’m not sure about this. a weekly isn’t too egregious, but honestly i think that there shouldn’t exist any tools to reduce suspicion except for descending and ascending once again. suspicion-reducing actions become a grind, and increase the grindiness of all of the actions (such as mindjacking) which suspicion is supposed to reduce the grindiness of. budgeting yr suspicion should have to be carefully thought out!

on the other hand, “the Smuggler’s Criterion” is just great. so i’m conflicted!!

but I do want to know what happens to that Tier 5 Criterion if a Mindjacker *doesn’t* have any Matterium; is it considered met or unmeetable?

It should be considered met.

Transferring 1 Suspicion as a Weekly Action doesn’t seem too broken to me.

@Bucky Fine, but it doesn’t say that - or at least that isn’t clear in the text - so this probably needs a tweak to the wording.

It’s a clear logical if-then. It’s satisfied whenever the “if” clause is false or the “then” clause is true.

That is computer programmer logic! You may wish to review how if-then clauses work in actual language, which is extremely varied https://www.grammarly.com/blog/conditional-sentences/

A clear phrasing would be to simply remove ‘if one has any Matterium’, which is entirely the source of the ambiguity, as well as being extraneous.