BlogNomic: The First Dynasty of Desertfrog

:p

  We can just add actions in their own rules; no need to create a new framework.

We have one for inventions.  This also allows quick and easy amendments to allow new restrictions on commoner actions as a whole.

for the moment

@lordcooper: Um… what? Explain in a way that makes it look like you’re addressing my point, please.

“An Invention has one or more Parts, listed in subrules of this rule”

We have a specific rule allowing the existence of Inventions and Parts, within which to place sub-rules referring to specific parts.  By amending rule 2.2 a Commoner is able to place a change on the way ALL Parts / Inventions work in one go.

This proposal would offer the same in regards to Commoner Actions.

Ah, I understand now. CoV

Although I’m not entirely sure what three actions a week each being “counted as a Weekly Action” is trying to say.

The way I understand it, it prevents people from using the same action three times on the same week

CoV   as I think it should have a more specific name than just “actions”; as it stands it’s just begging to be scammed.

Per Darth Cliche

Kevan, as I read it, each action is considered a separate weekly, so you’d have to track each separately (as, e.g. I, II, and III) in the GNDT to ensure that violations don’t occur. It would be nice to have that said more explicitly, though, so I suggest that lordcooper propose an addendum if this passes.

This might need rewording.

This is presumably trackable via GNDT comments, like weeklies normally are, so I don’t see a tracking problem. The only thing that I’m wondering about is whether these should be invention effects, rather than possible the rest of the time.

Why a separate rule to do this? Let the actions be their own rules.

What’s the point, again?  When we want actions, we’ll propose them.  And we probably won’t want to be restricted.

Eh, CoV

because i dont see the point of 1000 subrules to this rule. You may ask why not, I ask why.

Additionally: “A Commoner is capable of up to 3 actions in a week.  Each individual action shall be counted as a Weekly Action.”

I dont understand this sentence. Quote by the Ruleset: “If a game action is a Weekly Action, each Commoner able to perform it may take that action once per week, but not more than once every twenty-four hours.”

But it counts as a Weekly Action? Does this mean, you can do such an Action three times a Week, but no other Weekly Action then? (If yes, this should be clarified.) But then “As a weekly action, a Commoner can Scavenge;” fails…

Sorry, but strong

COV per Keba. I was on the fence with this till now.

CoV after reviewing…

CoV

for speed.