If there does not exists a rule named “Inquisitions”, then this Proposal has no effect. Otherwise:

Replace in the rule “Inquisitions” the text:

When the Auspex receives an Inquisition, if:
* The sender or either of the Collaborators is a member of the Target;
* The List of Heretics includes a Believer not in the Target; and
* There is a believer that is a member of the Target who is not named in the List of Heretics;
He may deem it unsuccessful. Otherwise, he may deem it successful.

with the text:

When the Auspex receives an Inquisition, if either of the following three conditions is true, then they may deem the Inquisition unsuccessful:
* The sender, or either or both of the Collaborators, belongs to the Target;
* The List of Heretics includes a Believer who does not belong to the Target;
* There exists a Believer who belongs to the Target but is not named in the List of Heretics.
If none of those three conditions is true, then the Auspex may deem the Inquisition successful.

Replace in the rule “Inquisitions” the text:

If the Auspex deems an Inquisition unsuccessful, he may make a blog post exposing the Inquisition which:

with the text:

When the Auspex deems an Inquisition unsuccessful, they should make a blog post exposing the Inquisition. That blog post should:

Replace in the rule “Inquisitions” the text:

If the Auspex deems an inquisition successful, he may:

with the text:

When the Auspex deems an Inquisition successful, they should: