Unpopular, with 2 votes FOR and 7 AGAINST. Josh
Adminned at 12 Oct 2022 12:03:52 UTC
Repeal the “Malign Emperors”, “Alliances” and “Bounties” special case rules.
These special cases are used in practice so rarely that they could simply be reproposed every time they come up.
Malign Emperors does seem worth keeping; it’s been tested, it works, and “can’t veto dynastically, can’t combine with No Collaboration, frame this in big letters as the Emperor being ‘evil’” are the kind of clauses that might not occur to someone writing this from scratch (if it even occurred to them to write the proposal at all).
, mildly; fine with Alliances going away, the other two seem to have marginal utility
BlogNomic is an online Nomic: a self-modifying game where changing the rules is part of the game. Players make blog posts proposing additions or alterations to the ruleset, discussing and casting votes in the comments: if enough vote in favour, the rules are changed and play continues.
The game has been running since 2003 and resets every month or so. Have a look around the wiki for more information and history. New players are always welcome and can join in the game at any time.
BlogNomic is powered by pMachine ExpressionEngine.
Hi, I’m back. (Quorum is 4.)
lendunistus: he/him
had a dynasty idea that uses malign emperors that I want to run someday, so I’ll selfishly suggest to keep that