Saturday, October 22, 2011

Call for Judgment: Spring clean in October

Comments

zuff:

22-10-2011 20:35:56 UTC

Hopefully there aren’t any silly flaws in this one…

omd:

22-10-2011 20:37:36 UTC

against Illegal due to not explaining the issue that requires urgent attention.

Hix:

22-10-2011 20:39:12 UTC

You make it sound like that’s the reason for your vote.  If it’s illegal, it’s illegal.  But if not, it’s a good idea. for

Amnistar: he/him

22-10-2011 20:44:22 UTC

for

Pavitra:

22-10-2011 20:47:23 UTC

for

Murphy:

22-10-2011 20:48:40 UTC

for

zuff:

22-10-2011 20:54:46 UTC

And, by the way, they’re all failing apart from the last two; one is the broken one this replaces, and one is this one itself, but like I said, we don’t actually need a spring clean, so it’s fine.

Ornithopter:

22-10-2011 21:01:23 UTC

for

zuff:

22-10-2011 21:04:35 UTC

This isn’t a votable matter.

Josh: Observer he/they

22-10-2011 21:04:37 UTC

for

Ornithopter:

22-10-2011 21:06:44 UTC

Christ. This is why I don’t play Agora.

Well, one of several reasons.

scshunt:

22-10-2011 21:13:58 UTC

Actually, I have to agree with zuff and comex here. This does appear to be illegal.

zuff:

22-10-2011 21:16:59 UTC

Indeed. Pavitra is working on a ratification (/not/ retroactive) CfJ to solve this and (if it exists) the arrival bug, and to clean up the CfJs in the process.

Roujo: he/him

22-10-2011 21:18:04 UTC

for In case it isn’t actually illegal. =P

Ornithopter:

22-10-2011 21:18:18 UTC

Oh, I agree. It’s just annoying.

scshunt:

22-10-2011 21:22:27 UTC

how is this not a votable matter?

zuff:

22-10-2011 21:26:44 UTC

coppro: See comex’s comment.

Prince Anduril:

22-10-2011 21:29:11 UTC

Yep. Not a legal CfJ, needs S/k’ing and reproposing