Saturday, March 09, 2013

Proposal: Standard Notation for Costs

Self-Killed. -RaichuKFM

Adminned at 10 Mar 2013 07:50:52 UTC

Enact a new subrule of Rule 2.3 “Resources, entitled “Costs”, with the following text:

A Cost is an action or payment upon which other actions may be contingent. To Pay a Cost, a Captain carries out the instructions specified by the action that contains that Cost. A Captain cannot Pay a Cost unless they have the means to pay it in full. (For example, a Captain with only 1 Dilithium cannot Pay a Cost of 2 Dilithium.)

Paying Resources is done by removing the indicated Resources from a Captain’s Resources.

The Resource Symbols are {T}, {D}, {G}, {S}, and {A}; and the numerals {0}, {1}, {2}, {3}, {4}, and so on.

There are five Primitive Resource Symbols: {T} is Tritanium, {D} Dilithium, {G} Gold, {S} Silver, and {A} Aluminum. These symbols are used to represent Resources, and also to represent Resources in Costs. Primitive Resource Symbols, in Costs, can be paid only with the corresponding Resource.

Numeral Symbols, such as {1}, represent generic Resources in Costs. Numeral Symbols in Costs can be paid with the specified number of Resources, regardless of the type of Resources used. The symbol {0} represents “zero resources” and is used as a placeholder for a cost that can be paid with no Resources.

I think I’ve ported these rules correctly…let me know if I missed any important points.

Comments

RaichuKFM: she/her

09-03-2013 21:27:37 UTC

against Seems unnecessary with the symbols for Resources already defined, and Trading using terms defined in the Glossary.

kikar:

10-03-2013 00:11:00 UTC

against I agree with RaichuKFM

Larrytheturtle:

10-03-2013 03:28:36 UTC

against

Purplebeard:

10-03-2013 09:13:31 UTC

against

quirck: he/him

10-03-2013 09:29:54 UTC

against

MurphEngineer:

10-03-2013 12:44:24 UTC

against Self-Killed (actually, you’re right—this is unnecessary)