Friday, January 17, 2025

Call for Judgment: Starting to build up a corpus of case law

Passes 6-0. Enacted by Brendan.

Adminned at 18 Jan 2025 23:38:58 UTC

The Rebuilt Team has scored. JonathanDark first changed ‘result’ into ‘rebult’ in the rule The Crew, and then used the typo correction provision of Spelling and Formating to correct Rebult to Rebuilt.

Said provision reads:

Participants may correct obvious spelling, punctuation, typographical, and/or formatting mistakes in the Ruleset, the Building Blocks page, and their own Pending Votable Matters at any time, including replacing Spivak and gender-specific pronouns that refer to Participants with the corresponding forms of the singular ‘they’.

This CfJ asserts that ‘rebult’ is not an obvious typo for ‘rebuilt’ (it could equally validly be ‘rebut’ or ‘revolt’ or ‘rebel’ or, indeed, ‘result’, the word from which it was derived), and for a spelling mistake to qualify as a mistake it has to have been unintentional; crafting one deliberately may or may not be an appendix scam but either way it probably isn’t properly a mistake. Therefore, revert the change made in this wiki edit and revert any Triumph gains awarded on the basis of the term ‘rebuilt’ having appeared in the ruleset, and reinstate each Participant’s Target as of this wiki edit.

Comments

ais523:

17-01-2025 18:22:21 UTC

I think this raises interesting conceptual questions about what a typo is, but I’m leaning towards Josh on this one – the typo in question was clearly introduced intentionally, and therefore is not a mistake.

FWIW, “s” is nowhere near “b” on the keyboard, but “u” is a very plausible typo for “ui” given that “u” and “i” are next to each other – if we made the assumption that this were a typo, “rebuilt” would be the primary possibility because other possibilities would require hitting a key on the keyboard that is too far away. But the “mistake” definition seems clear enough to override all that.

SingularByte: he/him

17-01-2025 21:41:16 UTC

for  Yeah, mistakes tend to need to be unintentional in some way and changing letters for an objective doesn’t fit the bill.

ais523:

17-01-2025 21:54:20 UTC

for

JonathanDark: he/him

17-01-2025 22:42:54 UTC

As the perpetrator of this crime, I confess.

  for

Brendan: he/him

18-01-2025 00:59:44 UTC

against Who said mistakes have to be unintentional? I make deliberate mistakes all the time when writing proposals.

Josh: he/they

18-01-2025 07:41:33 UTC

@Brendan Mirriam-Webster, for a start:

Mistake implies misconception or inadvertence

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/mistake

 

Habanero:

18-01-2025 14:14:58 UTC

for

JonathanDark: he/him

18-01-2025 17:44:12 UTC

It’ll be a little bit funny if this fails due to not reaching quorum.

Josh: he/they

18-01-2025 19:35:03 UTC

CfJs can be passed with a sub-quorum majority after 48 hours.

Brendan: he/him

18-01-2025 23:37:11 UTC

for CoV as I bow my head to Josh’s superior dictionaria.