Monday, April 04, 2011

Proposal: Status

Times out, 7-7, and fails. Josh

Adminned at 06 Apr 2011 11:52:58 UTC

Part 1:
Add a new rule entitled “Status” with text as follows:

Players have Status attributes, which are tracked in the GNDT “Status” column as comma-separated values.  For example, if a Player’s GNDT “Status” entry is “s, -d” then that Player has the Status of “In Spoon” and “Undignified”.
* All Players have either the Status of “In Spoon” (which may be indicated in the GNDT as “s”), or “Out of Spoon” (which may be indicated in the GNDT as “-s”), but not both.  New Players begin as Out of Spoon.  All Players become Out of Spoon at 00:00:01 on each Sunday.
* All players have either the status of “Dignified” (which may be indicated in the GNDT as “d”), or “Undignified” (which may be indicated in the GNDT as “-d”), but not both.  New Players begin as Undignified.

Part 2:
The second, third, fifth, seventh and eighth unique Players to comment on this Proposal become In Spoon when this Proposal is enacted.  All other Players are Out of Spoon.
The second Player to comment on this Proposal, and any Player whose final counted Vote on this Proposal is “AGAINST” (but not “DEFERENTIAL”), are Dignified when this Proposal is enacted.  All other Players are Undigified.

Comments

lilomar:

04-04-2011 20:39:20 UTC

Don’t have to be unique to get the Dignified status…

lilomar:

04-04-2011 20:39:30 UTC

for

spikebrennan:

04-04-2011 20:47:40 UTC

for (EAV)

Roujo: he/him

04-04-2011 20:55:59 UTC

for IN SPOON! =D

Josh: Observer he/they

04-04-2011 20:57:36 UTC

Sorry, Roujo, you’re not in spoon - it needs to be 3rd / 5th comment, not 3rd / 5th vote.

against

Josh: Observer he/they

04-04-2011 20:58:01 UTC

Ah, right, unique, nevermind.

Travis:

04-04-2011 21:13:10 UTC

Spoon! against

William:

05-04-2011 00:18:46 UTC

for

Darknight: he/him

05-04-2011 01:22:35 UTC

against

Saakara:

05-04-2011 01:37:30 UTC

for

Ely:

05-04-2011 06:18:05 UTC

against

Florw:

05-04-2011 06:43:17 UTC

against

Purplebeard:

05-04-2011 07:01:12 UTC

against Proposals that care about the order of votes/comments are inherently unfair, so I vote against on principle.

Subrincinator:

05-04-2011 13:00:29 UTC

for

Kevan: he/him

05-04-2011 14:29:06 UTC

for Vote-positions seem okay here, as it’s unspecified whether Spoon and Dignity are good or bad.

Chivalrybean:

06-04-2011 15:29:57 UTC

against