We already have a method for dealing with invalid locations.

as per Ienpw III

I sort of like ‘Christendom’, at least for the creativity value. Anyway,  per Ienpw.

We have two equally valid ways to deal with illegal locations. This one requires consensus, which I like better than one person telling you what to do.

So did the rule to allow the one person telling you.

also per Ienpw, but I like how the South Pole has become prison

Also per Ienpw.  More of a gulag, really…

Based on the logic that allow the prime meridian, there is nothing that excludes Christendom.

The Prime Meridian is an unchanging location (well, set of points). Christendom, in the sense in which you use it, is the collective location of a group of people, analogous to the location of one person. Does anyone suggest that, say, ‘George W. Bush’ is a valid location?

for speed

CoV for speed
I hate voting speed on this, but it’s pretty clear this won’t pass, no one other than NOI’s arguing for the legality of Christendom, and the Djinni’s already voted for this, so I have faith that the difference between this passing and failing is effectively nothing.

NOI: It’s also analogous to “every molecule on Earth that’s been hit by a neutrino in the last week”, in that it’s a large group of individual things of no fixed place that drop in and out of the group.

Ienpw: In what way does it require consensus? The rule is that if there’s “any dispute or controversy”, the Djinni gets to move you wherever he wants.

CoV for speed. Ienpw possibly means that if the Djinni is making crazily unpopular judgements about what counts as a legal location, we could just take that power away from him, or end the dynasty.

Ornithopter, if you can find a wikipedia article on the neutrino molecules, you’re welcome to move there. Don’t blame me, the prime meridian folks started this one. I was in favor of sane locations only.

I meant that the vote to allow that power was intentionally given to the Djinni.