Proposal: Still kinda confusing…
Timed out. Passed. 11 arrows. Clarity, no matter what High Command says, is important.—Rodlen
Adminned at 20 Feb 2009 17:58:52 UTC
Change rule 2.7.4 (General’s Orders) to read as follows:
The General may post a story post with the text [General’s Order] in the title. The most recent of these Story Post shall be stickied and is considered an “Active Order”. This story post should contain a list of orders that Soldiers are expected to follow such as actions which are disallowed 1. Soldiers may not restock their ammo. Each such Order shall be listed on a numerical list. A soldier may post a comment in the Active Orders with the text “Disputing Order #X” where X is replaced by the number of the Order which they wish to dispute, and include the reasoning for this dispute. The General then should respond to this post with either an acceptance of this dispute, signified by a :for: (in which case the Order shall be removed from the post and the loyalty or the Soldier that disputed the order shall be increased by 5), or a refute to the dispute, signified by a :against: (in which case the Order shall be removed from the post and the Loyalty of the Soldier that disputed the Order shall be reduced by 5). Only the first person to dispute an order has his loyalty changed as a result of disputing it. If the General fails to respond in 48 hours, the order shall be removed from the post.
Sure its confusing, but the confusion-reduction forms were harder to figure out than THAC0!
CoV
Qwazukee: Idle