Wednesday, February 18, 2009

Proposal: Still kinda confusing…

Timed out.  Passed.  11 arrows.  Clarity, no matter what High Command says, is important.—Rodlen

Adminned at 20 Feb 2009 17:58:52 UTC

Change rule 2.7.4 (General’s Orders) to read as follows:

The General may post a story post with the text [General’s Order] in the title. The most recent of these Story Post shall be stickied and is considered an “Active Order”. This story post should contain a list of orders that Soldiers are expected to follow such as actions which are disallowed 1. Soldiers may not restock their ammo. Each such Order shall be listed on a numerical list. A soldier may post a comment in the Active Orders with the text “Disputing Order #X” where X is replaced by the number of the Order which they wish to dispute, and include the reasoning for this dispute. The General then should respond to this post with either an acceptance of this dispute, signified by a :for: (in which case the Order shall be removed from the post and the loyalty or the Soldier that disputed the order shall be increased by 5), or a refute to the dispute, signified by a :against: (in which case the Order shall be removed from the post and the Loyalty of the Soldier that disputed the Order shall be reduced by 5). Only the first person to dispute an order has his loyalty changed as a result of disputing it. If the General fails to respond in 48 hours, the order shall be removed from the post.

Sure its confusing, but the confusion-reduction forms were harder to figure out than THAC0!

Comments

Qwazukee:

18-02-2009 23:48:43 UTC

imperial  arrow

Rodlen:

18-02-2009 23:55:41 UTC

imperial

Devenger:

18-02-2009 23:59:08 UTC

for

Klisz:

19-02-2009 00:01:27 UTC

imperial

Amnistar: he/him

19-02-2009 00:23:55 UTC

for

Wakukee:

19-02-2009 00:54:12 UTC

for  arrow CoV

TrumanCapote:

19-02-2009 03:43:21 UTC

for  arrow

Rodlen:

19-02-2009 05:46:03 UTC

for COV arrow

Klisz:

19-02-2009 06:13:45 UTC

There’s no flavor text. Why are you voting arrow ?

SingularByte: he/him

19-02-2009 08:50:19 UTC

for  arrow

ais523:

19-02-2009 10:05:13 UTC

for  arrow Yes there is flavour text, and I rather like it.

Kevan: he/him

19-02-2009 10:43:38 UTC

for

dogfish:

19-02-2009 10:48:10 UTC

for there’s a “loyalty or” typo though :)

Devenger:

19-02-2009 13:23:59 UTC

CoV for  arrow (now I spent the time to understand THAC0, I know your claims MUST be false.)

Amnistar: he/him

19-02-2009 15:55:20 UTC

for  arrow

arthexis: he/him

19-02-2009 20:28:15 UTC

for  arrow

Wooden Squid:

19-02-2009 20:48:10 UTC

for

Wakukee:

20-02-2009 21:00:01 UTC

12-0, but wait for more arrow ?

Gnauga:

21-02-2009 01:51:24 UTC

for  arrow