an unnecessary additional level of tomfoolery.  no argument present.  why should i vote for this cfj?  where is the “conflict between two or more players” that warrants our highly esteemed cfjs?  i’ll check to see if it is carefully hidden in the obfuscatory gndt.  until then, if there is a reason to fail the one(1) currently pending dov, we can change our votes on it, for which one might also reasonably expect an argument.

i still don’t see why we need to be able to make cfj’s during a hiatus

WE need them in case of a huge disaster.

example plz

well, you know all those times when the candidate wins the popular vote but then you need a second popular vote just to call into question the validity of the first popular vote.

bush v. gore, my kind kindling.  has it been so long?  do you not remember the shame and the anguish and the salty porcupine quills?

“math class is tough”
—Barbie

“so would capoiera if i had plastic limbs”
-person without plastic limbs

more seriously, please note that the DoV can still pass with cfj’s pending.  the rules only prohibit it from failing.

actually, you could probably fail/eliminate/veto/remove this cfj too.  it is about as instructive as to its own legality as the previous one.

Fiddlesticks.

What is the point of this filibuster?