Self-killed, failed by Kevan.
Adminned at 16 Jan 2010 10:50:49 UTC
Should only one Guest have the Health status of Alive, then that Guest is victorious.
Seems like a logical victory condition, and with no current rules for killing then it shouldn’t end the Dynasty too soon. Sorry if I’ve made some kind of newbie mistake in doing this.
Wording’s unconventional but, I think, correct. Deferential, because I’m unsure about the merits of an early victory condition, even if it is utterly obvious. (Besides, surely we want to catch the Murderer, rather than killing off everyone else?)
Actually, just noticed that this doesn’t explicitly create a rule. Precedent is that it implicitly creates a dynastic rule, but I think that precedent is a rather dubious one.
Also, doesn’t amend the ruleset. Conventional wording is: “Add a dynastic rule entitled [whatever], as follows: [content]”
Sorry about the mistakes. I’ll selfkill and resubmit with corrected phrasing. 
Will vote against regardless, I don’t want this Dynasty to be an automatic bloodbath.
BlogNomic is an online Nomic: a self-modifying game where changing the rules is part of the game. Players make blog posts proposing additions or alterations to the ruleset, discussing and casting votes in the comments: if enough vote in favour, the rules are changed and play continues.
The game has been running since 2003 and resets every month or so. Have a look around the wiki for more information and history. New players are always welcome and can join in the game at any time.
BlogNomic is powered by pMachine ExpressionEngine.
NoOneImportant:
Generally speaking it sounds OK, but I’m not sure of the wording.