Sunday, October 02, 2011

Proposal: Say Something Once, Why Say It Again?

Self-killed, 2-6 -Darth

Adminned at 03 Oct 2011 20:46:27 UTC

If the rule “Critical Acclaim exists and contains two copies of this text: “If an Artist has not made a new proposal for five or more days then, provided that no other Artist has done so in the preceding 3 days, any other Artist may reduce their Acclaim by 5, to a minimum of zero.” then amend the rule by deleting the second copy.

The proposal “An Exhibition of Yourself” amended “Critical Acclaim”, and in doing so accidentally (?) duplicated the paragraph in question. This wants fixing, for elegance reasons if nothing else.

Comments

Josh: Observer he/they

02-10-2011 10:06:46 UTC

for

Blacky:

02-10-2011 10:55:37 UTC

for

Prince Anduril:

02-10-2011 11:54:39 UTC

for

bateleur:

02-10-2011 11:57:36 UTC

<sigh> Unfortunately I’ve just noticed that people are still voting in favour of “This has been scammed at least once before” for some reason. Assuming ais523 doesn’t self-kill it, the rewording it creates will break this proposal.

Soviet Brendon:

02-10-2011 14:54:19 UTC

against

Bucky:

02-10-2011 16:27:27 UTC

against This proposal does not parse.

bateleur:

02-10-2011 20:03:14 UTC

@Bucky - Ha! Unmatched ” at line 10. Hadn’t even noticed that problem.

scshunt:

02-10-2011 21:02:10 UTC

against

Darknight: he/him

03-10-2011 03:55:43 UTC

imperial

Kevan: he/him

03-10-2011 09:07:46 UTC

against Sorry about that - I was intending to take the clause out entirely, but decided I should save that for another proposal.

bateleur:

03-10-2011 09:09:07 UTC

against Self-kill to simplify things for anyone else trying to fix this.