‘Cause I don’t like people

wouldn’t do anything because the text that’s supposed to be changed doesn’t exist in the ruleset.

Did I screw up again?

yeah, try copying the text from the current ruleset and not an older proposal

Is there some concern that “does not have a more recent valid [ballot] from the same poster” doesn’t actually work, and allows infinite ballots from a player? What’s the reasoning there?

The phrasing “A comment that does not have a more recent valid vote from the same poster” is kind of an invitation to argue that a Pawn may have several valid ballots, as long as the comment does not have a more recent valid ballot.

“has a ballot” also leaves a huge ambituity between “has cast a ballot” and “has received a ballot”.

Worth noting here that “Rolling Heads” was enacted incorrectly and didn’t change “has received the most valid ballots” to “is supported by the most valid ballots”, which may be causing unnecessary concern about whether older ballots are counted. I’ve now updated the rule to the wording that should have been enacted.