Saturday, March 03, 2018

Proposal: Tea Machine

less than quorum not voting against failed by card

Adminned at 04 Mar 2018 17:17:04 UTC

This proposal is considered to have the text of the proposal “Coffee Machine”

just giving the option

Comments

card:

03-03-2018 12:04:08 UTC

imperial

pokes:

03-03-2018 12:06:30 UTC

Which, for the record, is:

Set Dormancy to Inactive, then Idle Cuddlebeam.

for

Madrid:

03-03-2018 12:12:56 UTC

imperial

I’m doing things with a purpose, but I don’t mind standing aside if you’d like to continue with the previous status quo

Diabecko:

03-03-2018 12:23:17 UTC

imperial

Kevan: he/him

03-03-2018 17:01:03 UTC

Abstaining for now, since my DEF would cause this to enact. If only one player actually wants this to happen enough to vote FOR it, we probably shouldn’t do it.

Can we get some FOR/AGAINST votes here?

Diabecko:

03-03-2018 20:36:20 UTC

against

Diabecko:

03-03-2018 20:37:34 UTC

(Because it feels like kicking someone out and I’m not for that. I would like to avoid dormancy though if ever Cuddlebeam chooses to idle))

pokes:

03-03-2018 22:30:09 UTC

That’s fair. I’ll propose just deactivating dormancy by itself.  against

Madrid:

04-03-2018 14:36:18 UTC

Idling and trying to force someone (new) who can Violent people to join the game would be a play but I chose not to pursue it because its (weaponized) stalling