Friday, May 30, 2008

Proposal: Tech Ownership Correction Take 2

reached a quorum, final vote 7-0—Yoda
4 votes included the optional text, so the add-on passed.

Adminned at 30 May 2008 16:57:00 UTC

Replace “A DDA Member or Planar Entity may own zero or more pieces of Space Technology (abbr. Tech).” in the first paragraph of the rule 2.4 Technology with

A DDA Member or Planar Entity may be the owner of zero or more pieces of Space Technology (abbr. Tech). DDA Members and Planar Entities may only acquire or lose Tech by way of a successful proposal or as described by a rule.

If half of all counted FOR votes contain the phrase “that wording will do”, all DDA Members lose ownership of any Techs they currently own.

If I’ve got the wording right this time, then all will be right in the world again…ish. If I have got it wrong again, I reckon Amnistar can keep his damn Tech, we can at least fix the rule hole.

posted by Devenger at 30 May 2008 08:49:00 UTC Comments (9)

Comments

Devenger:

30-05-2008 08:58:17 UTC

for that wording will do as far as I (the writer of them) can see.

Amnistar: he/him

30-05-2008 09:57:17 UTC

for

*blows a rasberry*

:P

Yoda:

30-05-2008 12:21:13 UTC

for that wording will do

Oze:

30-05-2008 12:53:58 UTC

for

Rodlen:

30-05-2008 14:50:28 UTC

for That wording will do.

Amnistar: he/him

30-05-2008 15:29:25 UTC

interestingly enough?  In order for this to work exactly half the votes need to have That wording will do in it.

With that in mind…

for That wording will do.

Yoda:

30-05-2008 16:02:55 UTC

Actually, half can mean half or more, and here’s how:

Say 8 players vote for this proposal and 6 of them include the optional text.  Technically, 4 (half) did include the text, so it will pass.

Amnistar: he/him

30-05-2008 18:16:08 UTC

oooh, clever, that is true, I suppose.  But then it aslo could not mean half or more.  in that half of 8, 4, did not vote FOR, 6 did.

Meh, it’s not really that big of adeal :P

jay:

30-05-2008 21:51:46 UTC

for