Thursday, August 31, 2023

Proposal: The Bare Minimum

Withdrawn. Josh

Adminned at 01 Sep 2023 08:48:32 UTC

In the rule “The Conclave”, after the text “An Abandoned District may not make any response other than a null response.” add the following text:

If a District responds with anything other than a null response, it must allocate a sufficient quantity of resources in that response to result in a Score of at least 2, or if it is not possible to do so, a Score greater than 0 and as close to 2 as possible. If a District cannot respond with a null response and cannot allocate any combination of resources to result in a Score greater than 0, it must respond with an allocation of 10 People, or if it has less than 10 People, all of its People.

This somewhat mitigates the issue Josh pointed out with a District dragging out the Plenary Sessions with very low bids by establishing a minimum bid.

There’s also a hack where a District does not have the resources to get a Score other than 0, so technically they could allocate 1 People or 1 Energy for a Score of 0 and it wouldn’t be a null response, resulting in a “dying” District that keeps hanging on for a very long time. A penalty of 10 People in this case will ensure that a District that has little chance of winning will be removed fairly soon.

I’ll probably be impacted by this, but I’d rather not drag this out too long.

Comments

Josh: Mastermind he/they

31-08-2023 08:34:14 UTC

I can’t see that it’s a massive problem, but you’ve put the commentary text into the body of the proposal. That makes it proposal text. It looks like you did this intentionally, given that you put it into italic, but I can’t see a scam in it. For my peace of mind, could you pop it into the commentary box so it’s out of the way?

Josh: Mastermind he/they

31-08-2023 11:02:10 UTC

And that’s the edit window… I want to vote for this but my spider senses are going like the clappers

JonathanDark: he/him

31-08-2023 13:00:30 UTC

Sorry, that was truly a mistake.

against Withdrawn, I’ll burn a slot for my mistake and correct it in another Proposal.

Josh: Mastermind he/they

31-08-2023 13:04:10 UTC

Oh, thank you - I couldn’t see an angle but appreciate the clarity

JonathanDark: he/him

31-08-2023 13:07:41 UTC

Yeah, if I’m going to try a scam, I’m not going to slip it in as a mistake like this. That would be drawing too much attention right away. I completely understand the caution, though.

Josh: Mastermind he/they

31-08-2023 13:23:54 UTC

I have you down in my head as “scam-averse” which was also part of the confusion!