Call for Judgment: The Human Error in Our Stars
Timed out and failed, 2-2. Josh
Adminned at 18 Jun 2023 09:02:02 UTC
Reword the rule “Mindjacking” to the following:
A Mindjacker may carry out a Mindjacking as an Existential Action. A Mindjacking is the act of making a post in the Story Post Category with the title Mindjacking: (x), where (x) is a flavour-text string of its author’s choice; the contents of the post should be “The stars of (y) will guide me.”, where (y) is a Star Sign. At their earliest opportunity, the Ascendant shall mark this Mindjacking with a FOR symbol if (x) is the Symbol Name of an Avatar with Star Sign (y) whose Home Tier is higher than the author’s Level and whose Occupancy Tier is not; otherwise they shall mark it with an AGAINST symbol.
A Mindjacker whose Mindjacking has been legally marked with a FOR symbol by the Ascendant then Ascends and the Avatar named in the Mindjacking is destroyed. Immediately after Ascending this way, the Mindjacker’s Suspicion is set to 3.
Once a Mindjacking has been legally marked with a FOR or AGAINST symbol from the Ascendant according to this rule, it cannot be marked with another symbol.
Destroy all Avatars whose Symbol Names have appeared in Mindjackings which were marked with a FOR symbol by the Ascendant.
Consider Bucky to have Ascended, then set his Suspicion to 3; then consider lemon to have Ascended, then set her Suspicion to 3.
how’s this? the combination of “shall” and two “legally"s should ensure that the Ascendant’s mistakes are inconsequential and reversible, and the avatar destruction clause has been fixed (i hope)!
JonathanDark: he/him
That seems right, but Josh will have to weigh in to be sure.