, but don’t propose anything important on a Friday afternoon or Saturday morning, or it might hit the 7-day failure condition if the queue gets blocked.

Bold stuff. But I assume your contingency clause just covers explicit “if earlier proposal X passed” clauses, rather than the more common (and chaotic) problem of one proposal amending a rule, and a later one simply failing to take that amendment into account when making a further change. It possibly only requires some attentive vetoing on the Astrologer’s part, though.

And hmm, I don’t think the final clause works - it lets us have five pending, but doesn’t do anything about the rule that stops us from posting a third when we have two pending.

Is potentially 65 Proposals to process over two days a lot?

I mean, I understand it’s broken right now

eh, 65 might be if the admin tending to them doesnt pace well.

In favor of a slower moving process this time around.