Not that anyone would try…better safe than sorry. And now you’ve mentioned it, we kind of have to enact this rule.

Unnecessary: Rule 1.1 reads “The Ruleset and Gamestate can only be altered in manners specified by the Ruleset.”

The question I have is, is that page considered as part of the “gamestate” as said in Rule 1.1?

But, either way, this is the wrong way to go about it, it’s quite obvious that moving is a large part of this game, and being forced to make a proposal to move would stall it quite badly. 

Per Ienpw III, as soon as the mountain passes, the settlement becomes a game document and can only be changed according to the rules.

(Not valid until I’m unidled)

Per Ienpw.

SeerPenguin: this would allow changes “in accordance to the Ruleset”, so I don’t think we’d have that problem.

Although I don’t think the map becomes gamestate unless “I Never Met A Rogue I Didn’t Like” passes - gamestate is “any information which the Ruleset regulates the alteration of”, and the rule created by “The Mountain” only regulates the alteration of the GNDT Location field, it doesn’t regulate the alteration of the map.

We just need to say that the entire wiki page is gamestate.

S/K per the comments above