Wednesday, June 02, 2010

Proposal: The obligatory G-Man rule

Passes after more than 12 hours with exactly Quorum FOR (13-0), -Bucky

Adminned at 07 Jun 2010 01:08:57 UTC

Add a new dynastic rule titled “RNG-Man”:

The RNG is not considered an @ for the purposes of dynastic rules and the contents of proposals, except if explicitly specified.

Comments

Bucky:

02-06-2010 20:30:48 UTC

for

lilomar:

02-06-2010 20:32:33 UTC

for

Hix:

02-06-2010 20:43:05 UTC

for (I’ve already unidled)

Narya:

02-06-2010 21:11:08 UTC

imperial

Galdyn:

02-06-2010 22:51:28 UTC

for

Tiberias:

02-06-2010 22:55:16 UTC

for

Wooble:

02-06-2010 23:05:24 UTC

for

Jumblin McGrumblin:

02-06-2010 23:11:03 UTC

for

Darknight: he/him

02-06-2010 23:42:40 UTC

for I’m assuming that it’ll still write out in the rules when proposed like this?

Darknight: he/him

02-06-2010 23:44:47 UTC

Only said that cause the proposal doesn’t say create a rule with the following text lol

Klisz:

03-06-2010 00:52:15 UTC

It said to add a new rule, it simply shortened “with the following text” to a colon.

scshunt:

03-06-2010 01:19:15 UTC

for

(Note: this is ineffective until an admin unidles me).

I think the proposal works fine; there’s longstanding precedent in other nomics.

scshunt:

03-06-2010 04:26:13 UTC

for properly this time.

Aquafraternally Yours:

03-06-2010 06:02:21 UTC

for

Put:

03-06-2010 14:22:08 UTC

for