Friday, October 21, 2011

Proposal: The Second BlogNomic Civil War

Possibly Illegal due to being a Work of Art; however, it is kept open in case For The Love Of Suber passes. -Bucky

Self-killed -Darth

Adminned at 21 Oct 2011 11:51:18 UTC

Add a dynastic rule called ‘Factions’:

There exist three Factions called BLO, GNO and MIC, respectively. For each one of these factions, there exists a Ruleset and a Gamestate to which those rules apply. Each faction’s Ruleset is tracked on a page called “Faction [Faction] Ruleset II”, with [Faction] replaced with the Faction’s name. Every rule in Sections 1 and 3 are considered implicit in each Faction’s Ruleset with “Blognomic” replaced with the name of that Faction throughout, even if a Faction’s rule states otherwise. All Citizens of every Faction must obey all rules in Section 2 of the Blognomic Ruleset. Rules existing only in a Faction’s Ruleset have no effect outside that Faction’s Gamestate and Ruleset.

Add a dynastic rule called “Membership”:

Each Citizen may belong to at most one Faction (also known as being member of that Faction). This shall be tracked in a GNDT column named Faction. As a weekly action, a Citizen may change their Faction to any one of the three valid Factions. A Citizen is considered to be idle within each Faction that e doesn’t belong to. If a Citizen is ever un-Idle in a Faction of which e is not a member, e immediately becomes Idle within that Faction.

Whenever a Citizen makes an official post with the text “[Faction]” at the beginning of its subject (Where Faction is replaced by the Faction that the poster is a member of), then that post shall be known as a Faction Post and is considered to be made only within the context of the Ruleset and Gamestate for that Citizen’s Faction. Otherwise, it is considered to be made within the Ruleset and Gamestate of Blognomic as a whole.

Faction Posts cannot be made if the Citizen’s Faction has less than three Players (and if they are made, they shall be marked as invalid).

Now that the Work of Art rule is gone, we can propose, right? Anyway, given that the theme is once again Blo vs. Gno vs. Mic, I figure we should create Blo, Gno, and Mic just as last time. For more variety we can give them different themes this time around.

Comments

Darknight: he/him

21-10-2011 05:15:21 UTC

for So happy to be playing again that I don’t care what the theme is lol. Granted this one caused its own bundle of headaches lol

Klisz:

21-10-2011 05:16:41 UTC

for I don’t think it was the theme itself that was the problem, it was the encryption used by GNO.

Roujo: he/him

21-10-2011 05:17:11 UTC

for Yay! I wasn’t a player the first time around. =D

Darknight: he/him

21-10-2011 05:17:17 UTC

Ah good point.

Bucky:

21-10-2011 05:18:53 UTC

against because it does not clean graffiti from the relevant wiki pages.

Darknight: he/him

21-10-2011 05:20:12 UTC

Patch time.

Murphy:

21-10-2011 05:22:21 UTC

for

Darknight: he/him

21-10-2011 05:23:28 UTC

That better Bucky?

Ornithopter:

21-10-2011 05:23:49 UTC

against
Maybe we should be sure the invasion has ended before we start a civil war. Or make the invasion the new theme. Either way.

redtara: they/them

21-10-2011 05:27:40 UTC

imperial

Kevan: he/him

21-10-2011 09:16:55 UTC

against

scshunt:

21-10-2011 09:37:57 UTC

against

Shadowclaw:

21-10-2011 10:10:29 UTC

imperial

Wooble:

21-10-2011 11:27:34 UTC

against

CWW:

21-10-2011 11:42:30 UTC

against

Prince Anduril:

21-10-2011 12:31:43 UTC

against

Amnistar: he/him

21-10-2011 13:00:41 UTC

Invasion theme would be neat. against

ChronosPhaenon:

21-10-2011 13:45:50 UTC

against

Rodney:

21-10-2011 14:07:53 UTC

against Though I wouldn’t mind trying this one again, without the retro-CfJ this would create a third one. On further thought that could be a reason to vote for, but perhaps we should put out our current fires before starting new ones.

On a more pragmatic note, I’d rather see this finished. So,  against

Pavitra:

21-10-2011 16:22:50 UTC

against as it was written on the assumption that the re-enactment scam worked, which turned out not to be the case.

Brendan: he/him

21-10-2011 16:28:51 UTC

against

Klisz:

21-10-2011 18:50:57 UTC

against