Not gonna lie, I’m kinda in for this. My one other shot for a win was my intimidation proposal (I have 0 ideologies). This dynasty was fun for a bit but I think I’m ready to move on.

Side note: for wiki purposes, it might be a good idea to preserve the ruleset from before this passes, if it passes, since this repeals like everything.

If people want to end the dynasty by proposal then fine but it’s not going to go to Cuddlebeam arbitrarily; a weighted die roll based on Most Wanted is the least I’ll consider

Oh, okay. That happened. If you had done the math, cuddlebeam ended with 0% of the win percentage after what they outlined: 20+20+15+15+15+15=100

I don’t think this was a ridiculously greedy proposal or anything, unless they planned on going back on their word.

I did do the math, but any victory share that doesn’t prioritise the players who actually played the dynasty is the wrong way of doing it.

It was semi-greedy, in that Cuddlebeam personally believes that winning and passing the mantle has the glorious quality of victory, but it’s not ultimately about greed; it’s about ending the dynasty in the right way, not by throwing a dart and hitting whoever logs in and sees this proposal first.

Alright, thanks for explaining.

I wouldn’t be against setting up the die-roll proposal myself, (and I’ll keep playing if that doesn’t happen) but I don’t know how I would word it.

Influence Quorum is only 4, so this could have enacted with 30% left over.

Unimpressed by the casual gesture to trash the entire dynastic ruleset, here, rather than just stepping around the single sentence that stopped a straight has-achieved-victory.

since this has been vetoed.