Proposal: The tangled depths
self-killed, final vote 0-8—Yoda
Adminned at 16 Mar 2008 14:43:25 UTC
Modify the dynastic rule “Treasure” and replace the line:
For a Treasure to exist, it’s Name and Gold Value must be defined by the Proposal that created it.
with:
For a Treasure to exist, it’s Name, Location, and Gold Value must be defined by the Proposal that created it.
Add a new dynastic rule entitled “The Tangled Depths” which reads as follows:
“The Tangled Depths” exists as one location where treasure may reside. Captains still set their location to “Port”, “Sea”, or any other location specified within the rules but cannot set their location to"The Tangled Depths”. If any captain is in possession of a treasure map, and the treasure defined by the map exists within “The Tangled Depths”, E may try to retrieve said treasure as a daily action called “Diving for Treasure in the Tangled Depths”. This is done by rolling 2DICE20, and if the result is 8 or greater the captain is successful, gains possession of the treasure, and the map is destroyed.
Alternately, if a captain does not have a map, E may go “Diving for Treasure in the Tangled Depths” as a daily action by rolling 1DICE300. If the result is 295 or greater E is successful in finding treasure, and then rolls 1DICEN where N is the number of treasures marked in the wiki as residing within the Tangled Depths, and finally E receives the Nth corresponding treasure on the treasure page marked as residing in the Tangled Depths.
The daily action “Diving for Treasure in the Tangled Depths” requires the Captain to be at “Sea”, any flavor other than “Sour”, and have an army size of 1 or greater.
Yoda:
We need to set up the locations and how they relate to treasure maps first.
I like the idea, though.