Thursday, October 15, 2009

Proposal: [Theft] Resignation

Reached quorum with 14 votes FOR. Enacted by Kevan.

+15 to Excalabur, +2 to Darknight, Kevan, Ais523, Yuri, Jeff, Spike, Darth, Oze, Wooble, Qwazukee, Rodlen and Shem, +2 to Kevan.

Adminned at 17 Oct 2009 03:18:36 UTC

Create a new rule titled “Resignation” with the text:

The Leader may resign if e appoints a successor who agrees to serve as Leader until the end of the dynasty.

 

From the Fantasy Rules Committee’s “Regular Ordinances”, their Core Rules.  Their “Dynastic Rules” are much more freeform than ours, and not recorded anywhere.  Looks like a fun game, wish I’d gotten a cooler rule.  This one, though, is totally applicable to what we do, except that our Emperor has much different powers than their “Judge”.  Rules at http://groups.google.com/group/frc-play/web/regular-ordinances-revised-oct-2007

posted by Excalabur at 15 Oct 2009 07:45:35 UTC Comments (18)

Comments

Darknight: he/him

15-10-2009 07:55:57 UTC

for I could see this going core to pervent a dynasty’s doom if whoevers the “Leader” at the time needs to step away from BN. Thats happened way too often. Right Yuri? Lol.

Kevan: he/him

15-10-2009 08:03:47 UTC

for

ais523:

15-10-2009 08:33:29 UTC

for

ais523:

15-10-2009 08:34:55 UTC

oh, and @Excalabur: I actually play the FRC. It’s a good game normally, although it’s had a few bad dynasty-equivalents in a row (people making the dynastic rule-equivalents far too complex, making it too confusing to play). Its dynasty-equivalent turnover is a lot faster than BlogNomic’s; normally about 3 weeks.

Excalabur:

15-10-2009 08:55:46 UTC

ais523: The the anarchic nature of the game, that’s not really surprising.

I’m of the opinion that our dynasties are usually too long.

Excalabur:

15-10-2009 08:59:31 UTC

/Given/ the anarchic….

(Sometimes I can’t type, apparently)

redtara: they/them

15-10-2009 10:49:39 UTC

for

Josh: Observer he/they

15-10-2009 11:26:03 UTC

for

spikebrennan:

15-10-2009 14:03:45 UTC

for

I assume that “If there is no Leader, then the Acting Leader is the Leader for the purpose of the Core Rule entitled “Voting”, but not for any other Core Rules. (The Acting Leader cannot Veto Proposals unless they are also the Leader. )” from Rule 2.1.1 means that an Acting Leader can’t resign to end the current Metadynasty.

Klisz:

15-10-2009 15:23:38 UTC

for

Oze:

15-10-2009 15:26:44 UTC

for

Wooble:

15-10-2009 16:34:33 UTC

for

arthexis: he/him

15-10-2009 17:47:50 UTC

for

Qwazukee:

15-10-2009 21:01:04 UTC

for

Oranjer:

15-10-2009 21:07:18 UTC

for

Rodlen:

16-10-2009 00:56:49 UTC

for

Shem:

16-10-2009 14:45:07 UTC

for It doesn’t actually say whether this is a dynastic rule…

Kevan: he/him

16-10-2009 14:48:42 UTC

From the glossary, “If a new rule is created by a proposal and its location is not noted in that proposal, that new rule is to be placed in the Dynastic Rules.”