Monday, October 12, 2009

Proposal: [Theft] Too boring to entitle

Passes 13-1; +10 Josh, +5 ais (investor)—arth

Also +2 to Yuri, Spike, Oze, Darth, Darknight, Oranjer, Arthexis, Excalabur, Bucky, Rodlen, Kevan and ais523. And there is no Investment rule in the ruleset at the moment (nor was there when ais523 made his investing comment)—Kevan

Adminned at 14 Oct 2009 08:45:20 UTC

Add a new Rule to the Ruleset.  Call it “Retroactivity” and give it the following text:

No rule-change may take effect earlier than the moment of the completion of the vote that adopted it, even if its wording explicitly states otherwise. No rule-change may have retroactive application.

Worthy but dull. Don’t we have a clause covering this anyway?

Comments

Ienpw III:

10-12-2009 20:27:47 UTC

for No we don’t.

spikebrennan:

10-12-2009 20:33:21 UTC

for

Bucky:

10-12-2009 20:53:50 UTC

against

Oze:

10-12-2009 21:35:02 UTC

for

Klisz:

10-12-2009 22:20:43 UTC

for

Darknight:

10-12-2009 22:46:04 UTC

for

Oranjer:

10-12-2009 23:22:41 UTC

for

Qwazukee:

10-13-2009 00:11:08 UTC

against

arthexis:

10-13-2009 00:17:49 UTC

for

Excalabur:

10-13-2009 01:15:11 UTC

imperial  for

Bucky:

10-13-2009 02:05:04 UTC

CoV for  (Quorum)

Rodlen:

10-13-2009 08:05:25 UTC

for

Kevan:

10-13-2009 10:07:39 UTC

for

ais523:

10-13-2009 13:49:22 UTC

for

ais523:

10-14-2009 14:21:59 UTC

Investing