Monday, October 19, 2009

Proposal: [Theft] [Trivial] A tighter proposal cap

Timed out 2 votes FOR to 10 AGAINST. Failed by Kevan.

Adminned at 21 Oct 2009 13:19:12 UTC

Create a new subrule to “Ruleset Theft”, “A Tighter Limit”:

At any time, any player may propose one and only one change to the game, only if he or she has no other pending proposal.  If the player has a pending proposal, he or she may not make a new proposal until the pending proposal has been evaluated by the admin.  To make a new proposal, create a new post on the blog.  The posts on the blog homepage form the change queue.

From PCamp Nomic. I’m not entirely sure what this does; as far as I can tell, half of it’s stating the obvious, the other half is putting a proposal cap tighter than the limit in the core rules. (Strangely, PCamp Nomic is played on a blog too.)

Comments

arthexis: he/him

19-10-2009 20:30:46 UTC

against

redtara: they/them

19-10-2009 20:46:54 UTC

against

Klisz:

19-10-2009 21:57:49 UTC

against  veto

ais523:

19-10-2009 22:22:42 UTC

There’s a reason I marked this Trivial…

Bucky:

19-10-2009 22:43:20 UTC

against

Darknight: he/him

20-10-2009 01:36:38 UTC

against

Excalabur:

20-10-2009 04:14:26 UTC

for

Josh: Observer he/they

20-10-2009 06:03:50 UTC

against

Kevan: he/him

20-10-2009 08:33:12 UTC

against

spikebrennan:

20-10-2009 13:10:43 UTC

against

Oze:

20-10-2009 17:29:18 UTC

against

Qwazukee:

20-10-2009 18:43:59 UTC

against  veto