Reaches quorum and passes 6-1. EVC clause doesn’t trigger. -RaichuKFM
Adminned at 07 Aug 2016 18:08:17 UTC
If a number of EVCs greater than X, where X is quorum (as defined relative currently active players), posted to this Proposal contain the phrase “Raichu should have won already”, RaichuKFM achieves victory.
Otherwise, roll DICE2. On a roll of a 1, Bucky achieves victory. On a roll of a 2, RaichuKFM achieves victory.
Enough already.
I’m about 24 hours away from winning via normal channels, and Raichu posts an “I win” proposal?
your winning is pretty much dependent on Brendan actually making the winning post, isn’t it? Which is why this whole dynasty is now a mess. Really comes down to when brendan shows up and does something.
Well, I mean. I thought we were less than twenty four hours away from a coin flip victory.
And also, possibly, less than that away from me winning through normal channels if Manuscripting had been passed.
(I’d also like to point out that for the EVC to trigger it requires an outright excess of quorum, so if you are okay with the coin flip but not the EVC clause, a vote FOR can’t actually help the EVC win; but, Bucky seems against the Coin Flip, so.)
This was in case everyone else was as tired of this as I am; if not, well, that’s what Otherwise is for.
If you win in the meantime, well, sure, go ahead?
*Manuscripting had reached quorum before timing out and been passed.
Raichu should have won already
keeping my deliberation because its funny, but if I hadn’t rage killed my proposal, Raichu just would’ve needed Aft3rwards to vote on it sometime in the next ~18 hours and there is nothing that bucky could’ve done.
I was, for some reason, thinking Brendan could already make his weekly report and thus the game came down to Brendan’s timeliness and thus it wasn’t fair to Bucky for him to possibly lose because Brendan either voted on my proposal before doing the weekly update or simply didn’t make the weekly update in time.
But as Brendan can’t make the weekly update yet, it actually wasn’t really unfair to Bucky.
I wasn’t actually going to get Aft3rwards to vote FOR, but I was going to try to get Sci_Guy or qwerty to change their DEF. Or. Ask them to, I didn’t really have any leverage to persuade anybody.
There’s also the possibility that Manuscripting would have timed out before Brendan could make the Weekly Report, in which case I would have won.
Unless Bucky has a different way of getting a fourth score?
(Could be done with a Map introducing a wincon Bucky could immediately achieve, but that’s similarly Brendan-dependent; could be done with PoG except there’s just no time to get elected before the Proposal would time out.)
Bucky can increase his Speaker value via Material Requisition and 89 already fits all the criteria for SPK.
I wasn’t aware of that trick. Whoops.
Well, because of that, and also, apparently I wrote players instead of Scribes, in the definition of X,
CoV, not kicking.
So wait, does this actually legally refer to the Scribes RaichuKFM and Bucky?
Yes. That appendix rule only applies to the ruleset, Proposals can refer to Scribes by name without clarification just fine.
BlogNomic is an online Nomic: a self-modifying game where changing the rules is part of the game. Players make blog posts proposing additions or alterations to the ruleset, discussing and casting votes in the comments: if enough vote in favour, the rules are changed and play continues.
The game has been running since 2003 and resets every month or so. Have a look around the wiki for more information and history. New players are always welcome and can join in the game at any time.
BlogNomic is powered by pMachine ExpressionEngine.
Clucky: he/him