Wednesday, May 02, 2018

Proposal: tiebreaker

reached quorum 7-0 enacted by card

Adminned at 03 May 2018 19:05:56 UTC

Change “If there is a tie for the most valid ballots and those Candidates have cast a valid ballot,” to

If there exists a group of Candidates that satisfy the following conditions:
*all Candidates in the group have cast a valid ballot
*all Candidates in the group have the same number of ballots as the other members
*no Candidates outside the group satisfy the preceding two conditions
*no Candidates outside the group has a higher number of ballots
then,

this should work even if it’s probably an edge case to have 3 people tied at the end

posted by card at 02 May 2018 18:46:00 UTC Comments (8)

Comments

Madrid:

02-05-2018 19:47:08 UTC

for

Axemabaro:

02-05-2018 20:03:46 UTC

for

Corona:

02-05-2018 21:23:46 UTC

for

Lulu: she/her

02-05-2018 22:20:56 UTC

for

Kevan: he/him

03-05-2018 07:32:46 UTC

for

Thunder: he/him

03-05-2018 11:39:02 UTC

for

Cpt_Koen:

03-05-2018 18:17:45 UTC

I don’t get why this is needed? Is the word “tied” not specific enough?

card:

03-05-2018 19:04:36 UTC

it’s intent is to make it a requirement for the randomly selected candidates who are tied to have cast a ballot for someone else.