Call for Judgment: To each their own
Reached quorum 3 votes to 0. Final clause has no effect as there is no rule called “Monstrosities”. Enacted by Kevan.
Adminned at 12 Nov 2019 21:43:55 UTC
In the rule “Battles”, after the second paragraph, add a new paragraph as follows:
During a Battle, either the Monster or the Vanguard may take a Battle Action. A Battle Action may be either Monster or Human: any Battle Action that is specifically defined as a Monster Battle Action can be taken only by the Monster, and any Battle Action that is specifically defined as a Human Battle Action can be taken only by the Vanguard.
In the paragraph on the Monster’s Battle Actions (starting “If the Monster is not Recovering…”), replace “Battle Action” with “Monster Battle Action”.
In the rule “Boons”, in the third paragraph, replace “Battle Action” with “Human Battle Action”.
In the rule “Monstrosities”, in the fifth paragraph (starting “Monstrosities are the following…”), replace “Battle Action” with “Monster Battle Action”.
There’s a chance that Boon-enabled Battle Actions cannot be taken by the Vanguard because of the inconsistent application of the “Human” terminology. (We have taken such actions, albeit with no effect, but the wording leaves room for dispute.) So let’s fix this, and tighten the Battle ruleset a little bit in the process. I’m using a CfJ because it could affect my next Battle Action; open proposals are not affected, so far as I can tell.
for the fixes here, anyway.
Kevan: he/him
Hmm, good catch. This would mean that Card’s original Battle Action was illegal, and (since they never passed the Vanguard on) it’s still Card’s turn?