Friday, March 04, 2022

Proposal: Toebreaker

Timed out 3 votes to 3. Failed by Kevan.

Adminned at 06 Mar 2022 10:35:30 UTC

Add the following as a second paragraph to the rule Parallel Dynastic Histories:

All information held on a parallel dynastic history page is gamestate but not ruletext. No Maestro Team Member may undertake any action that is not explicitly described in or authorised by the ruleset; a parallel dynastic history page may not grant itself legitimacy nor imply that it is a legitimate ruleset document.

Enact the proposal found here: In the rule it creates, change “a Key Proposal with a relevant title of the poster’s choice” to “a Key Proposal with a relevant title (which is flavour text) of the poster’s choice”.


Brendan: he/him

04-03-2022 15:25:09 UTC



04-03-2022 20:21:53 UTC


Kevan: City he/him

05-03-2022 08:37:27 UTC

against Proposal title stuff aside, it still seems scammable to select from hundreds of rules from past dynasties and tinker with “any non-player-or-emperor-synonymous nouns” until you get something that the current ruleset is fooled into recognising as meaningful.

Lulu: she/her

05-03-2022 17:34:59 UTC


Roujo: he/him

05-03-2022 20:53:39 UTC

against per Kevan