Sunday, November 05, 2023

Proposal: Tome Maintenance

Timed out, 1-3 with 2 DEFs and Battle Master voting AGAINST. Failed by JonathanDark.

Adminned at 07 Nov 2023 22:21:53 UTC

In “Duels”, replace the paragraph beginning with “The Spell List” with

The Spell List for a duel is the set of all spells as they appeared in the ruleset at the time the duel was scheduled. The spell list for any particular duel is gamestate and should be tracked on the wiki page “Wizard Duel Spell List X” (where X is the duel number).

If “Unlocked!” passed, replace the last sentence of that paragraph with:

The Achievement List for a duel is the set of all achievements as they appeared in the ruleset at the time the duel was scheduled. The spell list and achievement list for any particular duel are gamestate and should be tracked on the wiki page “Wizard Duel Spell List X” (where X is the duel number).

Replace the last 4 bullet points of the atomic action to Schedule a Duel with

*  Randomly select a spell which is not mentioned in the effect of any Gewgaws affecting this duel. That spell is banned from this duel and shall be excluded from the spell list for this duel.
* Make a story post to the blog titled “Wizard Duel X” (where X is the duel number) which includes:
** the Wizard Ring for this duel
** a link to the wiki page “Wizard Duel Spell List X” where X is the duel number.
** the name of any spells banned from this duel
** the name of any Gewgaws selected for this duel

If the ruleset contains the phrase “For each Achievement listed on the spell list page for the duel” replace it with with “For each Achievement on the Achievement List for the duel”.

This should decouple the spell list from the wiki page where it’s represented so it’s easier to refer to the spell list as a collection of spells without having to refer to the specific wiki page. Also, the spell list being a “link to a wiki page” never really made sense to me.

Comments

Clucky: he/him

06-11-2023 00:57:38 UTC

There are circumstances where we want to be able to change a spell in the spell list—such as https://blognomic.com/archive/the_back_room_of_the_clothier. Wouldn’t this remove that ability?

Zack: he/him

06-11-2023 01:16:16 UTC

You mean through proposal? No, why would it?

Zack: he/him

06-11-2023 01:21:24 UTC

Oh, because the spell list is the set of spells “as they appeared in the ruleset at the time the duel was scheduled”? Maybe it would, but the point of the spell list in the first place is so spells don’t change for a duel once it’s scheduled, so the spell you chose doesn’t suddenly change on you by the time the duel commences. So I don’t support ever be changing the spell list after the duel is scheduled. Maybe someone should propose instead making a copy of the entire ruleset when the duel is scheduled and using that for the duel.

JonathanDark: he/him

06-11-2023 02:46:23 UTC

Might as well just leave things the way they are then.

against

Clucky: he/him

06-11-2023 03:12:41 UTC

But JonathanDark’s proposal shows why there are still cases where its useful to be able to change a spell after a duel has started—in this case its just making the Harden spell do exactly what everyone casting it expects it to do, just working with the new name.

Zack: he/him

06-11-2023 03:33:16 UTC

If I select a spell I wouldn’t expect it to do anything except what it said on the tin when I selected it. Also if we were on Duel 12, Back Room would change the name of a spell. What happens if I selected that spell before it was changed and then the duel commences?

Zack: he/him

06-11-2023 03:35:53 UTC

Re-reading it I see I missed the clause at the end that says change the selected spell of a wizard who changed Harden to Upgrade, I still oppose changing the spell list after it’s set though.

Raven1207: he/they

06-11-2023 03:41:24 UTC

against

Kevan: City he/him

06-11-2023 10:15:01 UTC

imperial

It still seems a bit much to be tracking the need-to-know gamestate for each duel in three or four different places, to me.

Snisbo: she/they

06-11-2023 10:54:58 UTC

imperial

Clucky: he/him

06-11-2023 15:06:43 UTC

against

Zack: he/him

06-11-2023 20:13:12 UTC

I’m not sure what you mean Kevan, this wouldn’t change where anything is tracked.

Kevan: City he/him

06-11-2023 22:33:11 UTC

Oh, that wasn’t a comment on the proposal, just the existing ruleset.