Sunday, June 06, 2010

Proposal: Tracking Kills

Passes with quorum FOR (15-0)
Adminned by who? - Qwaz

Adminned at 09 Jun 2010 04:18:33 UTC

If the proposal titled “Combat” is enacted, do the following:


Change the second paragraph of the rule titled “Combat” to

There is a numerical GNDT field called “Kills” that defaults to 0. When an @ fights something, after rolling damage dealt, they decrease the HP of whatever they fought by the damage dealt. If the HP of a monster goes below 1, they cease to exist and the Kills of the @ that defeated it goes up by 1. If the HP of an @ goes below 1, they die.

In the rule titled “Dungeons” change the text

The attempt is successful if they have defeated X or more monsters, where X is the result of that die roll, since their Dungeon Level last changed. If the attempt is successful, they increase their Dungeon Level by 1.

to

The attempt is successful if that @‘s Kills is equal or higher than the result of that die roll. If the attempt is successful, they increase their Dungeon Level by 1 and decrease their Kills to 0.

Comments

h2g2guy:

06-06-2010 19:43:07 UTC

for

Freezerbird:

06-06-2010 19:55:04 UTC

for

Klisz:

06-06-2010 19:55:53 UTC

for

Wooble:

06-06-2010 20:27:10 UTC

for

ScrumHalf:

06-06-2010 21:26:54 UTC

for

Bucky:

06-06-2010 22:55:06 UTC

for

scshunt:

07-06-2010 00:15:16 UTC

for

lilomar:

07-06-2010 00:52:27 UTC

for , although, since I like to be specific, at some point I’m probably going to make a proposal to change that text to say “change their Kills to 0” instead of “decrease their kills to 0”.

Galdyn:

07-06-2010 03:21:20 UTC

for

Darknight: he/him

07-06-2010 05:19:39 UTC

for

ais523:

07-06-2010 11:13:55 UTC

for

Klisz:

07-06-2010 13:40:56 UTC

lilomar: That’d be less specific…

lilomar:

07-06-2010 13:48:27 UTC

yes. I don’t know why I said that. I meant generic, which is the exact opposite.

Put:

07-06-2010 14:30:51 UTC

It’s not really an issue since if they succeeded their rule is positively above zero (no lame pun intended)

lilomar:

07-06-2010 14:33:59 UTC

it makes no difference now, if, somehow a @ manages (through scam or otherwise) to get their kills below 0, it would stay there.
I don’t know how that would be beneficial to a would-be scammer, but i just like to preempt loopholes.

Qwazukee:

08-06-2010 10:11:51 UTC

for

dbdougla:

08-06-2010 15:44:20 UTC

for

Wooble:

08-06-2010 15:58:01 UTC

imperial

Tiberias:

08-06-2010 16:34:39 UTC

for