Wednesday, June 22, 2016

Proposal: Trading Across

Passes 6-0. Enacted by Brendan.

Adminned at 22 Jun 2016 18:20:16 UTC

If the proposal A Hat, a Brooch, a Pterodactyl passed, this Proposal does nothing.

Otherwise, add a new Dynastic Rule to the Ruleset.  Call it “Exchange” and give it the following text:

Scribes can spend 3 of any one object tracked in the GNDT to gain 1 of any non-valuable object tracked in the GNDT.

The following objects are considered valuable:

Might as well throw my hat into the ring. There aren’t any valuable objects yet, but I figure an easy way to exempt objects is a good idea.

posted by qwertyu63 at 22 Jun 2016 00:48:00 UTC Comments (8)

Comments

GenericPerson:

22-06-2016 00:59:47 UTC

for Seems good.

RaichuKFM: she/her

22-06-2016 01:06:00 UTC

for

Bucky:

22-06-2016 02:03:20 UTC

imperial

Bucky:

22-06-2016 02:04:13 UTC

Vague; is Fame an Object?

GenericPerson:

22-06-2016 02:35:05 UTC

Not yet, but it seems like all those things in the bathing rule could be eventually. It is not inconceivable that one could use their fame to “purchase” something, or gain fame via donations. Looks I have more issue justifying, but it could be done the same way. Worst case they can be excluded as valuable objects.

Clucky: he/him

22-06-2016 02:46:35 UTC

for

Bucky:

22-06-2016 06:21:14 UTC

I’d prefer the opposite convention, with certain resources marked tradable.

Brendan: he/him

22-06-2016 18:18:42 UTC

for