Seems good to me, but since it’s still in the edit period the first section of text needs to have an “its” not “it’s”. Not sure if it has a major affect on interpretation but better to be safe than sorry. If it doesn’t get fixed though I won’t vote against based just on that.

Fixed, thanks.

No problem. I hate to be ‘that guy’ though.

I don’t know if I’ve ever seen a dynasty where this type of mechanic worked well for anything besides scams. Also, a little confusing that item destruction is an at-any-time action but dropping/picking up have no stated frequency.

Inventories are messy

[redtara] Items and Inventories are already implemented by Supply Requisitions. This just makes it so we can pass items to each other.

[Brendan] You’re right, but I think omitting the “at any time” from dropping/picking up is semantics because it’s implied you can do either as long as it’s possible. Destroying an item is always possible, but dropping or picking up an item could potentially not always be possible.

Or maybe I’m overthinking it but I still think the “at any time” part is implied anyway.

(Noting that this is currently stuck at 7-1 because Brendan’s DEF vote is cancelling out Josh’s and Cuddlebeam’s FORs.)

[Kevan] Brendan’s def vote is invalid though because of Imperial Deferentials. Does an invalid vote still cancel other valid votes?

It’s not explicitly an invalid vote, it’s just not a “valid Vote”. (I don’t know why one line of Core explicitly defines FOR and AGAINST as the “valid” votes.)

I’m assuming Brendan’s DEF is considered a cast vote per the Core line of “If a Citizen other than the Drone casts a vote of DEFERENTIAL…” - so Household Unit’s “While the votes cast on a proposal by a set of Floormates are not the same” would be able to see it, by the same token.